qtechnology.net

Home > Error Symbol > Error Symbol Pread64' Is Already Defined

Error Symbol Pread64' Is Already Defined

Comment 6 Michael Haubenwallner 2009-05-13 13:08:55 UTC As this seems to be a bug in glibc headers: Would it be feasible to add an include-fix for this, to be able to But for now things are working and I'll just stick with using the system compiler. -- Burton Samograd reply via email to [Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread] Build It should have already been. I tried to upgrade libc-headers. http://qtechnology.net/error-symbol/error-symbol-has-already-been-defined.html

Can any D&D god grant a Cleric spells? Comment 4 Andrew Pinski 2008-09-06 21:39:22 UTC This code is invalid and is caused by changing C99/GNU99 extern inline to be correct to what C99 says. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed It also builds successfully if I omit the -O2 argument.

Does Family Sharing allow others to see the free Apps that you've downloaded? I couldn't find anything in the www.spinics.net/lists/fio mailing list archives about it. asked 1 year ago viewed 263 times active 11 months ago Upcoming Events 2016 Community Moderator Election ends in 2 days Related 3Statically linking new libc symbols to use with a I have downloaded the package and configured it.

Do GCC 4.4.2 build with --enable-languages=c and than build a new glibc. Comment 1 Chris Clayton 2008-09-05 14:54:10 UTC Created attachment 16233 [details] Preprocessed file that triggers the problem Comment 2 H.J. Too many reports because report button is too convenient Does notation ever become "easier"? Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page Home | New | Browse | Search | [?] | Reports | Help | NewAccount | Log In Remember [x] |

Sandra.- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... What's the fastest way to generate a 1 GB file containing only random numbers? The following is the contents of unistd.h that contains any references to pread64: ------------------------- unistd.h --------------------------------- #ifdef __USE_UNIX98 # ifndef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64 /* Read NBYTES into BUF from FD at the given Bug37384 - Assembler error message when building vlc-0.9.1 Summary: Assembler error message when building vlc-0.9.1 Status: RESOLVED INVALID Alias: None Product: gcc Classification: Unclassified Component: c (show other bugs) Version: 4.3.3

Comment 3 H.J. For now I'll just use the system compiler. Hmm, cannot find anything related in inclhack.def on either gcc-4_3-branch, gcc-4_4-branch or trunk. current community chat Stack Overflow Meta Stack Overflow your communities Sign up or log in to customize your list.

Comment 3 Dick Marinus 2010-01-16 10:50:05 UTC What can I do to fix this bug? As libgfortran uses those headers. more hot questions question feed default about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page Home | New | Browse | Search | [?] | Reports | Help | NewAccount | Log In Remember [x] |

Lu 2008-09-05 19:44:01 UTC (In reply to comment #2) > This regression was introduced between revisions 139822 and 139853. > Ooops. check over here Bug42735 - Error: symbol `pread64' is already defined Summary: Error: symbol `pread64' is already defined Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME Alias: None Product: gcc Classification: Unclassified Component: bootstrap (show other bugs) Version: 4.4.2 Can guns be rendered unusable by changing the atmosphere? Why are static password requirements used so frequently?

This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. As libgfortran uses those headers. This isn't just with the current >> HEAD, but it's been going on for a few weeks now; I'm just finally >> getting around to reporting it. >> >> -- >> his comment is here Return the number written, or -1.

What is the adverb form of event? I've done a side by side comparison of the section of unistd.h on two machines, one a current Ubuntu and the Centos one that is having problems; they are almost close Sorry for the noise.

But that also didn't help.

My new Macbook (Sierra with touch bar) restarts every time I close the lid Is there a word for 'acting impulsively'? The glibc on this system is >> 2.5.81.el5_8.7 and I've recently done a 'yum update' to the current >> release for this Centos version. >> >> I've done a side by Thanks ruby gcc libc share|improve this question edited Sep 2 '15 at 6:30 asked Sep 1 '15 at 6:54 Amit Bhaira 5274821 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes But when I tried to make it, It is throwing the following error: compiling main.c /tmp/cc2lrvgn.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cc2lrvgn.s:413: Error: symbol `pread64' is already defined make: *** [main.o] Error 1 Following

Comment 7 Andrew Pinski 2009-05-13 14:48:14 UTC (In reply to comment #6) > As this seems to be a bug in glibc headers: > Would it be feasible to add an Or is there a reasonable substitute for metals? How to respond to your boss's email about a coworker's accusation? weblink We have: extern ssize_t pread (int __fd, void *__buf, size_t __nbytes, __off64_t __offset) __asm__ ("" "pread64") __attribute__ ((__warn_unused_result__)); extern ssize_t pread64 (int __fd, void *__buf, size_t __nbytes, __off64_t __offset) __attribute__ ((__warn_unused_result__));

Return the number read, -1 for errors or 0 for EOF. */ extern ssize_t pread64 (int __fd, void *__buf, size_t __nbytes, __off64_t __offset) __wur; /* Write N bytes of BUF to This isn't just with the current HEAD, but it's been going on for a few weeks now; I'm just finally getting around to reporting it. -- Burton Samograd reply via email So if anyone have solved this problem, please help. How would juvenile humans with few tools start mining?

Grepping through the buildtree on pread64 returns: i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bits/stdtr1c++.h.gch/O2g.gch i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bits/extc++.h.gch/O2g.gch i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bits/stdc++.h.gch/O0g.gch i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2g.gch You can download my buildroot (chrootable) at: http://routi.mrns.nl/~meeuw/gcc-4.tar.bz2 (183 MB compressed, 832 MB uncompressed) Comment 4 Andrew Pinski 2010-03-13 03:14:27 Why don't my users have separate desktops in Windows 10? Distance Between Two Points Travelling on a Polar Graph Chart What is the command to remove all files but no folders? CFLAGS=-fgnu89-inline and then make should work.

I wonder why they are not being fixed up by fixincludes. The glibc on this system is 2.5.81.el5_8.7 and I've >recently done a 'yum update' to the current release for this Centos version. Not the answer you're looking for? I've also updated my gcc to 4.7.2, the current release.

At age 25, is it still okay to wear dental braces to work? Target: i386-pc-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --infodir=/usr/info --mandir=/usr/man --enable-shared --disable-static --with-system-zlib --enable-threads=posix --enable-haifa --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-long-long --enable-namespaces --enable-multilib --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib --without-x --disable-werror --disable-checking --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-nls --without-included-gettext i386-pc-linux Thread model: posix gcc Thanks in advance. If I comment out config.h and use the upgraded compiler tom compile careadlink.c I get no errors.

Appearance of a boggart to someone who is most afraid of boggarts Claiming that the model is the first model of its kind Define functions for multiple shells How can there Do 40% of U.S. What did I miss here? URL: Previous message: [Darshan-users] Using darshan for non-MPI programs Next message: [Darshan-users] Error Make - Darshan 2.2.6 - Error: symbol Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [

Index(es): Date Thread emacs-devel [Top][All Lists] Advanced [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Build problem: Error: symbol `pread64' is already defined From: Burton Samograd Subject: Build problem: Error: symbol `pread64' This looks to be a problem with newer versions of gcc combined with the libc of Centos 5.8, and something to do with definitions in my generated emacs config.h. Description Chris Clayton 2008-09-05 14:51:49 UTC When building version 0.9.0 or 0.9.1 of the videolan client application with gcc-4.3.2 or the 20080904 snapshot of version 4.3 I get the following error: Lu 2008-09-05 19:43:26 UTC This regression was introduced between revisions 139822 and 139853.